✏️ Authorship Note (click to expand)This piece is 100% human-authored. No AI assistance was used in writing, editing, or proofreading this content. What you read here represents my authentic voice and personal perspective.
📚 Course Submission Note (click to expand)
This piece was submitted to Georgia Tech's ENGL 1101 as Project 1: Public Intimacies — A Personal Public Narrative.
"Just some naive amateur using a low-end oscilloscope! What's fake can never be real; you're just a kid who can't grow up." A user posting as JCDQ2003 cruelly dismissed me on a DIY electronics forum. As a self-taught ten-year-old, I was proud of repairing the oscilloscope I salvaged from a junkyard. I had pulled it from beneath a pile of discarded printers at the school recycling station, looked for outdated manuals from obscure corners of the internet, tested its circuits, and replaced damaged parts. I stood by my measurements. Yet JCDQ2003, a professional engineer with thousands of subscribers whose projects regularly made the forum's front page, publicly shamed me for questioning his design.
Those cursive words didn't just dismiss my findings, but also negate my acquirement, my poverty, and my audacity to speak in spaces where "real" engineers gathered. Following the post, other users piled on, some laughing at my shabby lab environment, others vilifying me for not being able to self-fulfill at a theoretical level. Seeing those comments, I felt like a poor, ignorant, stubborn child.
It wasn't accidental that I chose an online forum as my primary playground, rather than ordinary public squares like parks or schools; in a word, it was born out of isolation. While my peers spent afternoons racing remote-controlled cars, I would immediately flip mine over, locate its screws or snaps, and tear them open. Half the time, that poor car would wind up wrapped in tape, sinking in the bathtub as I attempted to convert it into a submarine. I loved every second of it, yet my peers just firmly identified me as a weirdo who broke the toys and kicked me out of the clan. On the other hand, the sequential process, like locating screws, tearing down shells, and modifying circuits, provided me with unprecedented stability during a period when my family life offered none. My parents had just divorced and separated life apart, leaving my existence into a wispy figure that ceaselessly commuted between two homes, two sets of rules, and two versions of self. Peers and families nearly span every possible societal connection for a ten-year-old, but I gain none from them.
As a result, I naturally transferred to online forums. Digital spaces generally promise acceptance based on contents rather than personal identities like age, economics, or family circumstances – only if nobody enjoys doxing for fun – that physical spaces don't. I used to treat that forum as my true home, a public square where thousands of kindred spirits gathered, yet where I could essentially remain alone and had the privacy of my circumstances.
Back to the cyberbullying moment, it broke my utopian hypothesis that online spaces make knowledge sharing democratic. Those mundane terms that a ten-year-old would never get in touch from the real world suddenly exposed to me: hierarchies, unwritten belongings, gatekeepers, weatherrockers… My bedroom -- which shuttled between my mother's apartment on weekdays and my father's house on weekends -- suddenly felt smaller. The forums had been my escape tunnel from that fragmented reality, a place where I thought ideas mattered more than circumstances. Now, even there, I was marked as an outsider.
My approach towards digital spaces became defensive, almost militaristic, as the result of that attack. I began "armoring" myself with concrete knowledge that nobody could negate, as the most sophisticated engineer in the world still has to obey Kirchhoff's Law. I began studying university textbooks on circuitry, teaching myself the mathematical proof behind any piece of my prior unspecified hands-on experiences, and practicing theoretical correctness rather than randomly tinkering within mistakes. Each equation derived, each concept understood, felt like an upgrade of my armor against possible humiliation. I documented the process and shared it online as revenge to that gatekeeper who wounded me, despite switching to a new username. In this way of learning publicly, I was making a statement about who deserves the qualification to make a full-stack, almighty electronic engineer.
Things went exactly the same way as my prediction. People began recognizing my work, and some even suggested me to post videos of my building process. The fully-armored me hesitated: videos would reveal my age, my shabby workspace, everything that once caused the humiliation. Yet I finally decided on transparency, believing that if they could see everything, there would be nothing left to attack.
The first video showed my young hands, steadily assembling a replication of the $2000 Marantz Preamplifier under low cost. There wasn't an AI dubbing tool by that time, so I narrated with my childish tone, explaining each component's utilization. I was so terrified of exhibiting so many personal details that I didn't log in until the next weekend, yet the comments surprised me. Engineers from real industries started following my channel, providing me with professional reviews and constructive feedbacks. Most of them joined my channel for my content's professionality rather than the novelty created by my childish figure. The public space that wounded me began to heal me, though in ways I didn't immediately recognize.
Then came the discovery that set my channel viral. While tinkering around with my ancient oscilloscope, I fortuitously developed an instant visualized method to distinguish sound quality discrepancies of any audiophile equipment. As a note, traditional electroacoustic measurements require expensive analyzers and output numerical results that are abstract and counterintuitive. My technique was unorthodox, however, due to the limitations of my equipment, yet it indicates integrated indicators at a glance. When I posted the video series explaining this, the view count exploded to 100k within days.
The numbers became intoxicating. I could spend a whole day sitting in front of my computer doing nothing but pressing that "refresh" button. More views, more subscribers, more likes, all of which metrics proved the recognition from the public, validating my success as a self-taught engineer. My phone buzzed constantly with notifications – comments, milestones, and increasingly, collaboration offers from audio equipment manufacturers. Visibility always comes with corruption. "Review our amplifier, please, name your price and we'll pay you," many promised, followed by a script document telling me exactly what to advocate. Others were more subtle: "We've sent you our earbuds. Please post a review if you find our product impressive, and we respect your honest opinions."
I accepted a few of those subtle requests while bouncing the brokerage; I posted objective reviews as usual; and I regretted it right away. My comment sections got flooded with bot-generated praise and coordinated attacks, depending on which interest group I had pleased or angered. The public square for knowledge sharing was getting colonized by the capital, with me being an accomplice. Another kind of pressure from the public, which was different from what I'd faced with the humiliation, suddenly came to me.
The temptation was real. They were bribing me with such large paychecks for posting one promotional video that I would instead earn from hundreds of non-profit videos. But accepting would mean betraying the community that had taught me, healed me, and trusted my independence. It would mean becoming one of the gatekeepers who values metrics over meaning, someone who once cyberbullied me.
Awakened to the truth, I chose differently. I collected tested units from my subscribers, while declining and sometimes publicly exposing those briber's tactics. My growth slowed, with aggressive comments even increasing – now from marketing competitors rather than bots. But my core audience, those kindred spirits I'd originally sought, remained. I even made an intimate friendship with the MOONDROP CEO, who appreciated my honesty and released a hotfix instead of viciously tipping off my video as many had done after I demonstrated a bug on their product.
On my sixteenth birthday, I finally had enough savings from the 1$ per 1000 views scanty platform rewards to purchase a decent oscilloscope. As I unboxed it, my thoughts returned to that humiliating event six years ago. Was I wronged?
I ran the exact same tests, which confirmed my original discovery with quantized evidence. I sat staring at the screen: with my current platform, I could publicly vindicate my younger self, could name the engineer who'd attacked me, could mobilize my audience to recognize his error, could accomplish my great "revenge."
Looking back on my journey, I suddenly felt vindication hollow compared to contribution. How others identify with me doesn't matter anymore; instead, how I see myself given power over others does. The public square that had shaped me, for better and worse, needed builders more than warriors. Oscilloscopes are tools for understanding, rather than props for performance.
The old oscilloscope sits on my shelf, its ancient circuit primitive but working. It doesn't see through some important signals, though: personal values can't be measured by any instrument but conscience.
It doesn't need external validation anyway. Neither do I.
Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this piece, check out my other Stories & Writings.
Want to dive deeper into my technical work? Explore my Technical Portfolio.
For ongoing updates and quick technical notes, check out the Tech Notes.
]]>
